You’ve probably seen the headlines from Fortune, Yahoo Finance, and others: “MIT Study Shows 95% of AI Pilots Fail.” It’s been making rounds across tech media, spooking investors, and reinforcing every AI skeptic’s worldview. But when you dig into the actual research from MIT’s NANDA project, a different story emerges—one that reveals more about sensationalist journalism than AI failure rates.
When you’re reading something (yes, even this post), you should always question the sources. Who is saying what? What is their agenda? For example, if an oil company is releasing their research on climate impact, you should be skeptical, right?
... read more